What It Is #111 | 9/11, San Bernardino & Hillary Clinton

There is a lot of stuff in the news this weekend of the 15th anniversary of 9/11, so LtV decided to take a shot at a live show.

Note: Please ignore the mention of the website that Jay said was in the chat. It’s some kind of marketing campaign and I don’t want to be associated with it.

23 thoughts on “What It Is #111 | 9/11, San Bernardino & Hillary Clinton

  • September 22, 2016 at 8:13 am
    Permalink

    Hi Nathan! Just discovered your shows and loving them. Thank u!

    Having a problem finding u on face-book and twitter. Clicking on the “top right” and “bottom right” icons on this Page >>

    Face-book says ” Sorry, this content isn’t available right now
    The link you followed may have expired, or the page may only be visible to an audience you’re not in.
    Go back to the previous page · Go to News Feed · Visit our Help Center ”

    Twitter says ” This site can’t be reached

    lifttheveil411’s server DNS address could not be found”

    I would love to follow u on twitter; can u give me your twitter name please.

    Reply
  • September 12, 2016 at 7:45 am
    Permalink

    Another comment on that suspicious police organization just crossed my mind as a track called ”Order out of Chaos” takes the spotlight in my musical playlist.

    Brought back that curious line ”bringing calm to chaos” to mind, which neatly aligns with one of the three key principles of the Hegelian dialectic [i.e. Order out of (organized) Chaos] by which the Freemasonic manual to global control is outlined in the Protocols of Zion by Albert Pike.
    [Nota bene: when you reflect on the subliminal meaning of that line, ”bringing calm to chaos” does seem rather ambiguous in its wording, as pacifying chaos doesn’t necessarily mean the threat has been neutralized nor that any necessary good has been established; just that order has been restored by whatever means (of diversion) imaginable. (think of how order and composure of mind and mood can be restored by assuring the public that vengeance will be taken. Surely that’ll soothe the unrest!)]

    Seriously, if you want to get a grip on the very foundations of Freemasonry and Illuminism, read up on Albert Pike’s blatantly sinister vision for worldly dominance and sordid exploitation of human resources as we are after all perceived as cattle in the eyes of so-called enlightened men that have been born into priviliged classes.

    Quote:
    ”Hegel’s dialectic is the tool which manipulates us into a frenzied circular pattern of thought and action. Every time we fight for or defend against an ideology we are playing a necessary role in Marx and Engels’ grand design to advance humanity into a dictatorship of the proletariat. The synthetic Hegelian solution to all these conflicts can’t be introduced unless we all take a side that will advance the agenda. The Marxist’s global agenda is moving along at breakneck speed. The only way to completely stop the privacy invasions, expanding domestic police powers, land grabs, insane wars against inanimate objects (and transient verbs), covert actions, and outright assaults on individual liberty, is to step outside the dialectic. This releases us from the limitations of controlled and guided thought. ”
    source: http://www.crossroad.to/articles2/05/dialectic.htm

    Reply
  • September 12, 2016 at 5:28 am
    Permalink

    Here’s my ”conspiracy of the day” [in the most frivolous sense of the word]:
    I think playful Lift likes to provoke Jay into [silently] vehement dissent just so he can relish being stared down by that sultry glance of hers.

    I know i wouldn’t mind being the focal point of such a tremendously powerful glance.
    ‘ts all natural.

    Appreciate to be given a look into the dynamic between the two of you, though i want to interject a point of criticism, addressing that subtle form of condemnation or contemptuous dismissal—albeit very gently and rather benevolently—by which she’s sometimes discouraged to expand on her views which, i must say, from time to time pleasantly surprised me in regards to the astuteness that typified’em.

    Although i get your point of view, thoroughly most of the time, i do feel strongly about recommending you to cut her a bit more slack than you think you are already doing, as the freshness of her voice (both appealing to the ear and intellect) definitely provides a more than welcome refreshment to the narrative which might otherwise risk becoming monotonous and solidified as unquestionable status quo, which i reckon none of us veritable philosophers would prefer.

    The drive behind this affectionaly biased argument of mine being to prevent a particular reality from steadily unfolding, in which she’d slowly be molded into that stereotypical role of frivolous sidekick (or side chick?) who’s been relegated to function as a spokeswoman for the mute yet urgent spectator.

    Although i know you wouldn’t consciously want to degrade her role into one of comparably marginal importance and respectability, i do feel as if you could be experiencing the unconscious tendency (as so many men experience in relation to women) to override (note: i’ll overrule you here, because it’s my show. Understandable though it may be, i reckon this didn’t come across too well with her, and she might’ve felt seriously disrespected there) her voice, or perhaps unwittingly patronize her. [who knows perhaps as part and parcel to the whole flirtatious vibe you’ve naturally developed a fondness for.]

    I know the insinuations might be slightly off here, but the whole aim of getting my feelings across is to speak in favour of, what i feel to be potentially, her unspoken feelings of resentment, that for the moment must not be all that serious but—if you would remain to be unaware of her feelings in relation to predominant behavioural patterns of yours—might develop into a snowball effect which could over time exert a detrimental influence on the rather lovely relational dynamic you two’ve been developing.

    I attached rather great importance unto breaking down my sensitive perception as i very well realize how the sneakiest culprit of the downfall of relationships of any kind is grave misinterpretation of feeling and the subsequent persistence of inappropriate conduct in accordance to what one thinks is the right thing to do.

    We all know women are rather complex by nature [which is not to illustrate them as entirely disparate fro men], and experience with my own curiously [for a male] feminine sense of perception has led me to reason that the main issue which disables men from grasping women is precisely because they instinctively think being dominant is a succesful way to attract or impress women.

    And while this may hold true for initiating contact or whatever feat required for setting the stage to prepare the performance, i find that this inherent predispostion for dominance is precisely the reason why many women feel so overwhelmed that they tone themselves down in the presence of men who, in your as in my case, tend to be intellectually overbearing at times.

    And just to top off the meal with some additional food for thought:
    a good mental excercise for any male to undertake in relation to a woman, is to ask your self what she’d really think of you if you were allowed unbridled access into her private [mental] realm.

    Usually one’s bound to realize rather quickly how we’re generally rather clueless—that is, if we’re truly honest—or, as is sadly most often the case, we fool ourselves into believing she perceives us in the exact way we’d want her to.
    ______________________________

    Just shedding a bit of light from another angle here.
    Thought you’d appreciate it.
    After all you’d only benefit from having someone like Jayjay stay faithful to you as colleague or friend, while being allowed to express her self in the most truthful and spontaneous manner managable.

    Peace out brotha.
    ___________________

    Oh, and i was as enthusiastic about the succesfulness of that intestinal analogy as you rather modestly were.
    The final line which ended with ”(…) that shit” jolted me with boisterous laughter.
    Hilarious!

    Reply
    • September 13, 2016 at 6:42 pm
      Permalink

      I’m going to be nicer to Jay and thanks for sticking up for her. It turns out I wasn’t accustomed to somebody disagreeing with me on my show. Anyway, we’ll be back Thursday for another round.

      Reply
      • September 17, 2016 at 1:04 pm
        Permalink

        Any sort of difficulties that present themselves whilst getting accustomed to this new format of interaction are all quite normal, expectable as well as acceptable, as far as i’m concerned.

        Cheers to you for taking the advice to heart.

        Reply
    • September 17, 2016 at 11:26 am
      Permalink

      Translation: We want more Jay.
      A+?

      Reply
      • September 17, 2016 at 1:05 pm
        Permalink

        That’s for sure!

        Reply
      • September 17, 2016 at 1:20 pm
        Permalink

        You should see episode 112, it will be right up your alley.

        Reply
  • September 11, 2016 at 4:14 pm
    Permalink

    And so many people are not who they are. Enough info on the internet on that one. All acting.

    Reply
  • September 11, 2016 at 3:32 pm
    Permalink

    Still one of my favorites. Presentation: where did the towers go

    Reply
  • September 11, 2016 at 7:34 am
    Permalink

    I don’t think A.J. is Bill Hicks. The voice doesn’t match.

    Reply
  • September 11, 2016 at 7:30 am
    Permalink

    The customer is always the customer. Jay improves your preformance.

    Reply
  • September 11, 2016 at 4:57 am
    Permalink

    ATOMIC WEAPONS DON’T WORK. Just in case you are tempted with this investigation.
    Notice in this official film of the Nagasaki A-Bomb the clouds do not move.

    Reply
  • September 11, 2016 at 2:02 am
    Permalink

    Sunday 1 September 10.30 Central European Time.
    Dear Nathan,
    I have just watched the first 30 minutes and will watch the rest later. The thought that enters my head as you talk about San Bernardino is how effective the “event” organisers and their propaganda teams are.
    911 is the truly major event in modern history that allowed an illegal invasion that cost 4 million lives in the global war on terrorism so far.
    Since then we have had a number of ‘false flag’ events that have been staged with glaring holes in the narrative. I suspect that the ‘glaring holes’ are put there to ensnare truth investigators like yourself.
    The masses will read a story in the mainstream media: exclaim how awful: then forget about it two weeks later. A few people like yourself will run with the story and point out all of the inconsistencies to a relatively few people following like myself. Nothing will happen because the mainstream media and most people will ignore the obvious facts, and anyway it’s old news to them.
    People, I suspect, will suffer from conspiracy fatigue because of the many false flag events and lump 911 in with them. This means the perpetrators of 911 and their propaganda machine are effective in dividing the resources of their would be attackers.
    OK this is where I press the crazy button because practically everyone you mention this to will not want to believe it and will suffer from cognitive dissonance. Say this to people and see what I mean:

    “Nuclear weapons do NOT work and radiation is NOT what your are told it is”

    Nuclear Weapons is the one great meme that the ‘elite’ use to control all narratives. If people wake up to this fact then they will realise it’s not country against country but an international cabal that controls everyones lives.

    Reply
    • September 11, 2016 at 10:26 am
      Permalink

      No nukes, I’m with you. I’ll talk about that one of these days. So what’s going on in North Korea? And the nuclear treaty with Iran? That’s the stuff I’m trying to figure out…

      Reply
  • September 11, 2016 at 12:17 am
    Permalink

    Finally. No YT! Will not make an account there. Glad you did this site. Good video. Much more to be explored.
    Check into the group known as “Gelitin”.

    Thanks

    Reply
  • September 10, 2016 at 10:08 pm
    Permalink

    Hey guys, Sorry about the initial test comment, but I have attempted to comment before and they didn’t go through for some reason.
    Anyway, I just wanted to say congrats on putting together some insightful and intelligent information out for a change. It seems to be one of my favorites for sure.
    Since it is 9/11 I would like to relate my journey into the conspiracy world (Aside from the daily chemtrailing in California and Arizona). My cousin, Charles Burlingame, was the pilot on the plane that hit the Pentagon, Flight 77, on 9/11. He was a family man from Wisconsin. His daughter was killed in a suspicious fire about five years later. Coincidentally, this fire happened the same week the feds finally released the video of the plane hitting the Pentagon after a lengthy lawsuit, of which she was a part of. The video also was suspiciously inconclusive and appeared heavily edited. She was dating a guy in the military at the time. He miraculously somehow survived the fire. I would’ve never believed 9/11 was an inside job until I received this news and started looking into things myself. If you would like more information on this story I would be happy to help you.
    Also any information you could find would be greatly appreciated.
    On a lighter note: Dude, quit hitting on Jay, and quit cutting her mic off, lol. We need to hear more from her. Take my advice, from one neurotic LA poker player to another😎. But seriously I think you have found your muse in her and your chemistry together seems to work well. Cheers, peace, and love…..

    Reply
    • September 11, 2016 at 10:33 am
      Permalink

      Thanks Ace, that’s really a crazy story. If we get our show together for 9/11 maybe you’d want to tell it on the show? I’m sorry your comment didn’t get through the first time, but they should all go through right away now.

      Reply
      • September 17, 2016 at 11:38 am
        Permalink

        I would definitely love to be part of the show. Although I know the blind masses are tired of this subject, I feel it is my duty to get to the truth for my family’s sake and obvious other reasons. It’s hard to believe the amount of disception that I have watched now grow into pile of unmistakable stinking manure. But of course I can’t criticize the US government these days can I?!….

        Reply
  • September 10, 2016 at 10:01 pm
    Permalink

    Per RT, they also have Max Keiser who totally hammers the bankers and NWO and several interview programs that examine international politics with astute European insights,along with US takes from Lee Camp, Watching the Hawks, Cross Talk , Boyko, Hedges, Sophie…watch ’em for a while and you’ll get a much broader idea of how diverse and mature the older civilizations they let speak, truly are.
    https://www.rt.com/shows/ I pass through most of them during a week and find some mighty objective views…NOT, NPR Neocon Pubic Radio, PBS Propaganda Broadcasting System.

    Reply
  • September 10, 2016 at 9:50 pm
    Permalink

    Ms. Jay struggles against admitting that there is collusion in tsunami proportions on the big stage.
    Per voting, consider the body of ‘dislikers’ of shillery, the many disaffected former Sanders supporters, the huge number of folks seeing both candidates as useless, the huge number who know that the government is over the edge corrupt and the only voice showing any honor and ethics in the face and to the face of the above is Jill Stein. If people just got enough of the word on her, she could easily snag the election.

    Reply
  • September 10, 2016 at 9:43 pm
    Permalink

    I am not a spook or troll, testing 123

    Reply
  • September 10, 2016 at 7:54 pm
    Permalink

    You cracked me up with “effed in the a.”

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *